Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
ahunter3: (Default)
As author of autobiographical nonfiction, I'm occasionally questioned and challenged about my recall. I even once had a potential publisher tell me I could not market my book as nonfiction at all, since human memory is so unreliable!

That's an extreme position, and hence pretty easy to dismiss, but to a lesser extent the question has come up in various ways several times.

I do appear to have an unusually good recollection of events in my own life, but another factor involved here is that I've often written about things that happened to me, the events that had an impact on me at the time. That means that when I sit at my computer to write in the 2020s about something that happened to me in the 1980s, it's typically something I've written about previously. That works on two levels: the previous act of prowling through those memories and pondering them in order to write about them probably keeps them fresher than if I hadn't thought about them much in the intervening years, and in many cases I have copies of what I actually wrote at earlier points.

Within the Box has a couple pages of description of my first incarceration, in 1980, as a student at the University of New Mexico.

Here is a portion of that, followed by a snippet or two of an earlier description of the event from 2003 and one from a yet earlier description I wrote in 1982.


I dealt with Mountain View by starting my own local chapter of Mental Patients’ Liberation Front, and even though they were utterly coercive and we had no rights to speak of, I managed to get most of the patients in agreement that we should listen to each other and be mutually supportive, and try to ignore the horrible treatment the institution was subjecting us to. And I also got the support of a significant percent of the staff members, to the point that it polarized the institution and disrupted its functioning. I was making sense to a lot of people, and making their jackbooted authoritarian ways look silly and indefensible. Upper echelon clinical staff eventually decided I was a rabble raising psychiatric rights activist and booted me out, as if they’d caught me trespassing.

(from Within the Box, "Day Eleven" chapter)


So I make friends with the other mental patients. I’m thinking initially “I don’t belong here this is a mistake”, like most of you probably would, but the other mental patients here on the Seriously Disturbed Ward…umm, they don’t think they’re Napoleon and they aren’t seeing pink elephants and I can talk to them. Heck, I can even explain the stuff in my papers that got me into this place and they understand it (with varying shades of disagreement or ideas about what some things would mean that don’t overlap with my own). And I can understand the stuff that they are wrapped up in and concerned about...

After a week or so, we have started calling ourself the “patient people” instead of “patients” because to survive in this place you need to be very patient with the confrontational and abusive staff who belittle you and order you around, and patient with the situation in which you’re locked up and when not in immediate danger from the psychiatric professionals are generally bored. And we start referring to the staff when they behave at their worst as “impatient people”. We continue listening to each others’ stuff and give each other reality-checks and confirmations of the authenticity of feeling this or that based on what has happened to us here or there, and give each other pragmatic advice and sympathy and just someone to talk to about it. And pretty quickly we’re overtly saying that the only therapy in this place is what we are providing to each other. There are a couple of nurses, one in afternoon shift and another on night shift, who applaud this and say it is excellent. There are others on both of these shifts and everyone on the morning shift who regard it as inappropriate behavior and try to discourage us from talking to each other. The woman whose husband put her in there has a doctor who starts issuing instructions to the staff to stop this behavior. My doctor is mildly supportive but mostly for what he thinks it means regarding me individually. He thinks this is all my doing. At first it sort of was except that it caught on like wildfire once some of this stuff had been said out loud once or twice. There is another doctor who thinks the whole phenomenon is a great success story for “milieu therapy” which usually means “the therapeutic advantages of being surrounded by walls and barred windows” but now because we are essentially doing mutual therapy (and not assuming each other to be “sick”, by the way) we are part of each other’s “milieu” …at any rate he thinks it’s all wonderful and is instructing his patients to participate in our home-grown group sessions.

By the fourth week the staff is openly bickering, not just in the conference room behind the nurse’s station but in front of us out on the ward floor, and we’re behaving like calm patient little Zen masters. One guy hooks up the teenage couple with an attorney friend he knows and although he won’t “take their case” he gives them simple legal advice. I flirt with the married woman in front of her husband when he comes to visit and we imply to him that the two of us are having an affair in the hospital and he suddenly starts saying he’s going to talk to the doctor about her coming home. The guy with the Jesus freak parents is drawing his nightmare visions in crayons and it seems to help him cope and for crayon drawings they are pretty good.

Then one day I’m out in the barbed-wire enclosure (“yard”) where they let the patients go to smoke and get sunlight and when I come back in I find all my stuff is piled in the middle of the intake corridor and they won’t let me go onto the floor. “You aren’t crazy and you can’t stay here. You have to leave. Take your stuff and get out of here.”


(from a message board post, 2003)


...[I]nto the modern shiny psychiatric institution was tossed a stranger who had been handing out strange feminist manifestos, and he had just recently read an article about a group of psychiatric inmates calling themselves Mental Patients' Liberation Front, so when he deciced he wasn't getting what he'd come for, he decided to start a chapter right there in the hospital.

And the members of this new Mental Patients' Liberation Front wanted to talk about sex and politics and religion and love and suicide and life and death; and some of them wanted to sleep with each other while others wanted to sleep on the couches or on the floor, and they said, "So what if it it's emotionally intense, or unorderly, or different from normal? Does it hurt anything?" They complained about the godawful boredom, and some of the women put their makeup on their boyfriends while the men giggled, and the men shaved their eyebrows instead of their cheeks while the head nurse scowled from his plexiglass office.

In group therapy, the patients, now calling themselves the patient people, began discussing and redefining values. The nurses who had come to beam parentally and guide the therapy were told they could join in or listen patiently, but not to interfere impatiently with the patient people talking; after awhile, some of the nurses started talking, too.

But there were also a lot of very threatened and insecure people there who didn't like their reality tested like that, and they yelled, became violent, and insisted that personal contact was psychologically damaging to their patients' well-being. The patient people insisted otherwise, but the fearful ones lost their patience as rapidly as they were losing their patients, no matter how patient the patient people tried to be with them. Psychotropic tranquilizer drugs were ordered all around. It didn't look good for the patient people.

But some of the other therapists and an administrator or two began speaking up for the patient people, saying that these outspoken patients had an interesting set of ideas about reorganizing the care plan procedure of the institution. Some of them even went so far as to say that they didn't think the patient people were crazy at all.

Until one day a fiery MPLF radical or two found all personal possessions stacked in piles on the corridor floor after returning from weekend pass:

"You can't stay here any more. No, you can't talk with any of the other patients. Get your stuff off our floor and leave. If that stuff is still here tonight, it goes outside into the street."


(from The Amazon's Brother, unpublished, written in 1982)



—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

I have started querying my third book, Within the Box, and I'm still seeking advance readers for reviews and feedback. It is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
In last week's blog post, I noted that I need to rework portions of Within the Box to include more tension between me and the staff of Elk Meadow around being gender-atypical. As it stands, I've got Derek thinking a lot about gender inside his own head, but you really have to read between the lines a lot to get any sense of Elk Meadow as sexist or heterocentric or transphobic.

This kind of falls between the cracks between nonfiction and fiction. There's a lot that I recall from the actual events of 1982 without recalling the granular details, and mostly that hasn't mattered much, but in this case I remember the folks running the place being very sure of themselves in their conventional gendered attitudes, and I need to convey that better. So although this specific conversation didn't take place, I think it's not a dishonest insertion. Things sufficiently like this occurred.

This is the start of Day Seven, which is one of the shortest chapters in the book, so it's a good target for expansion. (As originaly written, this entire scene ends with "Well, it’s better than being sneered at in derision or being informed that I’m intellectualizing"; the rest is new.

(This isn't the only insert I'm planning. Just the limits of what I've actually done so far)

-----

Day Seven

A less apologetic Dr. Barnes shows up at our unit’s morning meeting. “Derek, it is good to see your face here among us this morning. Derek has come to some important conclusions about us here at Elk Meadow, has decided he’s in the right place after all. I think we’ve all seen how someone can come to recognize important truths that may not have been apparent to them when they first arrived. So let’s all go forward with a fresh start attitude.”

I guess that’s better than being sneered at in derision or being informed that I’m intellectualizing.

“Our Mark Raybourne tells me that you don’t care if other people don’t see you as a real man”, Barnes continues. “That’s actually a healthy attitude.” He glances around the room, gathering everyone’s focused attention. “For all of us, sooner or later we have to look into the mirror and deal with the person whose opinions matter: ourself! And I think Derek has been trying to tell us that, that it’s not your opinion of him that counts, and it’s not mine, or the opinion of any of the Elk Meadow staff that counts...”

Barnes crouches down slightly, resting his hands on his knees, narrowing the focus back to me. “A real man has to live up to his own standards. He has to put down the excuses and the avoidance strategies and face up to his mistakes and his errors of judgment, and examine any patterns of self-destruction he might be stuck in. A real man can’t be satisfied with being less than what he can be, what he was born to be, and you’re right, Derek, it’s his own opinion of himself that he has to live with.”

Barnes straightens up and opens his hands, palms upward. Benign kind fatherly face in place, waiting.

“I agree with you about being honest with yourself and living up to your own standards”, I say, “but what I was talking with Mark about the other day is that I’m not into all that ‘be a man’ stuff, the standards I have for myself aren’t centered around masculinity. I do have standards and sometimes I don’t meet them and have to work on myself or, you know, try to deal somehow with my faults, but I don’t aspire to a lot of the things that were pushed at me in the name of proving I’m a man”.

“Well now, one thing I think you should examine, since you’re being honest with yourself as much as possible, is whether you’re using that as an excuse...”

Barnes steps back slightly and holds up one open palm, a stop sign. I don’t think I was reacting visibly, but it’s possible that I did. Or maybe Barnes just finds it expedient to act as if I was about to argue. “I’m not saying you are”, he continues, “but what if you’re using that as a way to set your aspirations in a way that doesn’t leave you open to failure. Just consider that. I mean, anyone could redefine their failures and disappointments as their goals, hey look, everybody, I always wanted to be an unemployed homeless guy with a drug habit, I’m a rolling stone, I’m a tumbleweed and I’m free, never wanted to pay income tax and live behind a picket fence. See how that works?”

“Well, I don’t think I conjured this attitude up to excuse what some people regard as my failures. I was a university student a couple years ago and doing okay in my courses, but I was keeping a scrapbook in my dorm room, I wrote ‘Militant Heterosexual Sissy’ on the first page, and the more I took those ideas seriously, the happier I felt about myself. I was never like the other boys and I never wanted to be. It’s not that I didn’t think I was as good as other boys. I used to think I was better than them. I don’t really think that way now, but I do think I’m different. And always have been. But to your other point, yes, I think I have things to work on, ways in which I don’t measure up to what I want of myself, and that’s why I’m here”.

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

I have started querying my third book, Within the Box, and I'm still seeking advance readers for reviews and feedback. It is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. I was going to start echoing it on Substack as well but we're not off to a good start. Anyway, please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
I've paused querying my third book Within the Box.

As I've mentioned, I hate querying. Well, lately I've come to realize that when I have a task that I hate, my default way of handing it is to take a deep breath, scrunch my face up tight, and then go at it with single-minded determination, blocking out everything else, and just blast ahead it until it's done, thinking "let's get this over with!".

And that's often effective and efficient, but there's also a price tag. For example, one of the things I detest is getting rained on. I hate the feeling of cold wet clothes and wet feet in squishy socks and wet hair in front of my fogged-up glasses and the slipperiness of the wet ground and getting chilled from it and everything about it. But when my attention focuses so narrowly on just getting to a covered destination, I block out awareness of obstacles, the terrain, and other moving objects like cars and other pedestrians. My intense dislike for the sensations means I'm trying to not pay attention to how anything feels. So I have dashed out in front of cars on occasion, I've bowled over people with umbrellas. I once twisted the hell out of my ankle trying to round a corner on a wet cobblestone. I'm a menace to myself and other people when I'm being rained on.

So with that in mind, I've realized I shouldn't approach querying my book with that attitude. I have grudgingly sought feedback on my query letter from people in a forum I dislike almost as much as the rain, and before I got banned for not being sufficiently grateful and appreciative, I acquired enough comments and observations to let me (after I cooled off somewhat) shorten and tighten it.

They made me realize how inadequate and inappropriate my comparable literature list was -- it's nearly all fiction, and my book isn't! And the titles that weren't were mostly published over a decade ago. "None of that should matter", I mutter, annoyed with the industry. "My tale has more in common with these fiction books, and who cares when the damn book was published, that should tell them what my book is like!". Yeah. Uh huh. I dash through the rain because I don't like to be rained on and I'm just trying to get out of it. When it comes to querying, I don't like it that lit agents want titles that are in the same genre as the book being queried, and of recent publication. I don't like it that they expect me, the author, to tell them about where my book would fit into the current publishing market.

Meanwhile, I have also belatedly realized my book is weak in one area that it shouldn't be, an area I'd like to tout in my short descriptions of it as one of its feature strenghts: Derek is not just a patient being subjected to violations of patient self-determination in Elk Meadow facility, he's also specifically a genderqueer individual being viewed through a homophobic and sissyphobic lens. I need that tension to be there. But although I've got Derek's own internal musings about gender well-documented in the tale, he's keeping that so much to himself that the gender-identity tension between him and the institution isn't very well illustrated! So perhaps I will rewrite some of the internal dialog spots as conversational dialog, ideally within a group therapy scene and maybe followed by informal continuation with other patients around the cafetaria table. Or perhaps I will write entirely new scenes to handle this.

Also meanwhile, I continue to read from the book in its current form to my bi-monthly author's circle, and so I continue to make little changes in response to the feedback I get from the other authors.

All total, I need to stop approaching the selling of my book to a lit agent as a necessary chore to dash through. I need to wait until the book is in its best form, and I need to hone my querying tools patiently instead of trying to jam some words on a page and get it over and done with.

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

I have started querying my third book, Within the Box, and I'm still seeking advance readers for reviews and feedback. It is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. I was going to start echoing it on Substack as well but we're not off to a good start. Anyway, please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
There is definitely a personal emotional stake when you write about yourself, about what happened to you, and then make it available to others. It's different from writing fiction. I mean, you can have a significant ego investment in being the author of a work of fiction, and it can leave you vulnerable to dismissive or hostile opinions of readers and potential publishers and whatnot, but at least what's being rejected is your creation, your art. When it's autobiographical, it can also come across as a rejection of you personally: that what happened to you, what you went through, isn't interesting or important. Or that you, as the main character, are not interesting to read about.

That vulnerability is heightened when the specific portion of your own story that you're trying to share is a segment involving psychiatric hospitalization and diagnosis. There's the general shadow of being examined and found to be mentally out of order, to be not processing things as a healthy stable person should. That sort of raises the stakes -- or at least it can, depending on whether you agree that you were indeed in a deteriorated state of mind during that segment. I don't. So in Book #3, Within the Box, I'm inviting the reader to weigh the evidence and think about whether I was the person in the story whose mental processes were worrisome or if, instead, I'm the person in the tale who makes the most sense, whose reactions and behaviors were the healthy ones.

Querying a book -- trying to get a literary agent interested in it, so that it could perhaps get placed with a mainstream publisher and end up being read by a lot of people -- is by its very nature a vulnerability-making prospect. No matter what you've written, putting it out there in hopes of getting a rare thumbs-up isn't a particularly pleasant experience. It isn't a seller's market, at least not for unproven / unknown authors. Your query goes in a big pile and the people to whom you sent it will accept only the tiniest handful of prospects and reject the rest.


I am out at work. Both as a genderqueer person and as a person with a history of psychiatric diagnosis. I've nearly always been so, wherever I've worked, refusing to be silenced or shamed. Since I was out in my private life (which was as public as I could make it), there was always the risk that an employer or colleague or coworker would encounter that, so I preferred that they know in advance. It was my litmus test for whether the venue was a place I'd want to work: if you can't deal with it, hire someone else!

My current employer is the NYC Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, which is actually involved in psychiatric intervention and treatment of people, which makes it a little trickier if someone were to develop the opinion that I'd been quite rightly diagnosed and perhaps have a brain that processes things in a less than ideal fashion.

I'm seeking early-reader opinions and feedback on the book, and among the other places I've sought them, I have made such an announcement at work. Three colleagues I know fairly well from ongoing interactions asked for a copy of Within the box. That was in December. Having not heard a peep, I sent a follow-through email to the three of them on July 6, "Checking in with folks who requested a copy of Within the Box...If any of you would like to discuss the book, shoot me an email!". No reply so far. It's a bit hard not to imagine them reading and going "holy shit" and developing a rather worrisome new view of their coworker Allan. I mean, I am kind of putting them in a position where they either need to set aside some conventional assumptions about institutional behaviors and professional behaviors or else reconsider whatever opinions they'd previously developed about me. What if that went the wrong way?


All of this vulnerability is quite predictable, very much "you opted for this situation going in" stuff. Including the likelihood that if I get upset about any of this, or depressed about any of this, or worried or angry about any of this, that my less-than-cheerfully-stable response to it could get interpreted in a light that other people's behavior generally doesn't. Yes, I did know all that going in. I wouldn't be doing this if I didn't believe it needs doing, and I also wouldn't be doing it if I didn't have a lot of confidence in my ability to cope with it.

In fact, to be honest, I'm actually a bit too close to arrogant about it. Picture me staring at you sardonically and laughing and telling you, "After what I've been through in my life -- including the events from the tale I'm hawking in the form of this book -- there's not much that the world is likely to dish out to me that doesn't leave me saying 'I've survived worse', ya know?', so bring it on!"

Maybe that arrogance needs to get reined in now and then. I'll admit, it does occasionally get intense for me.



—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

I have started querying my third book, Within the Box, and I'm still seeking advance readers for reviews and feedback. It is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. I was going to start echoing it on Substack as well but we're not off to a good start. Anyway, please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
"List some books that are similar to yours. (500 characters or less)" reads the query manager entry for both Kristin Nelson and Stephanie Rostan, two professional literary agents.

It's not explicitly required by all lit agents and publishers, but some folks advise including a "comp titles" section on any query letter.

I haven't tended to, but it was definitely in my formal proposal (which, in turn, is required by some lit agents and publishers for any nonficton queries, and memoirs are nonfiction), and I had a standalone Comparable Titles snippet I could include whenever it was a part of what was requested.

So now that I've generated at least a rough draft of my third book's query letter (see previous blog post), I've started work on assembling a list of other books that Within the Box has some important resemblance to.

"You may be intimidated or skeptical, thinking either that your idea has to be unique in order to pique their interest, or that your book needs to be similar to others, or else there won’t be an audience for it. The reality here, like with most things in life, is somewhere in the middle", says Kevin Anderson.

Yeah... I'm not aware of any other first-hand account of being in a rehab clinic that turns out to have similarly sinister overtones. Or a genderqueer person's narrative about having their inability to function well socially attributed to their drug-addled mental instabilities instead of pinned to marginalization and society's biases and attitudes. But let's see... books with a lot of internal thought-processing and which invoke a sense of a possibly unreliable narrator who may be more messed up than she thinks she is, in a place or in the care of people who are supposed to be taking care of folks but may be doing something a lot more evil...


Eileen by Ottessa Moshfegh looks promising. It's a first person narrative from an unguessably different individual, one who seems sharp but perhaps damaged goods in some not fully explained way. Definitely an outsider. She's not institutionalized but works in one (a juvenile reformatory prison). A facility that is at least officially and nominally about doing good but pretty evidently, from the narrator's observation, isn't. A narrator who cares about her interactions with others and is vulnerable on a number of parameters, but not in the usual manner; she's an interesting mixture of impervious and insecure. And Eileen is even more self-immersive than Within the Box -- very little action and events have occurred in the first 60 pages.

Dennis Lehand's Shutter Island takes place in a high security forensic psychiatric hospital. The main character and his companion are federal marshals brought in because one of the committed inmates has gone missing. But readers learn pretty early on that the main character has some hidden agenda of his own involving a murderer who killed someone in his own family, a murderer committed to this same facility. And he may not be wrapped as tightly as he likes people to think. Something's totally up with the shrinks running the place, too. They're not playing honestly with the agents; the marshals don't believe the inmate could have escaped without assistance from at least some staff members, perhaps highly placed ones. And now, 50 pages or so in, I'm seeing signs that they may be doing conscious and deliberate things to manipulate their federal guests... or is it the narrator's paranoid imaginings?

I'm also 45 pages into A Head Full of Ghosts by Paul Tremblay. The first person narrator is the younger sister of Natalie, a brilliant high school student who created entertaining stories but whose imaginings are going very dark and twisted. Natalie is clearly suffering -- she says so -- and her behaviors are impacting others in her family negatively, making her situation different from that of a person who may merely be perceived by others as deranged.

You get more of that from A. Mark Bedillion's Psychiatric Survivor. Or that's my expectation at any rate. I haven't started it yet, it just arrived in the mail. But it's billed as "from misdiagnosed mental patient to hospital director", and it clearly comes from the critical perspective that we call the psychiatric patients' liberation movement or the anti-psychiatric movement. So it is unlikely that the author will position himself as believing he needed to be in the facility, and equally unlikely that the people running it will be portrayed as agreeing with him.

Another couple books I picked out as prospects are Good as Gone by Amy Gentry, which a brief inside peek revealed itself to me as a suspense tale in which a daughter returns after years of being missing, but the mom actually isn't at all sure that this girl is really her. That creates the worry that the situation may be a dangerous one for her family. And An Anonymous Girl from Greer Hendricks and Sarah Pekkanen, the first couple chapters of which shape up as a psychological chess game in which a girl swipes another girl's invite to a paid research project involving personal questions about moral choices, and in which the psychologist running it knows she was not being honest about how she came to acquire the invite.

Then there's The Girl on the Train (Paula Hawkins) -- unreliable narrator, substance abuse, questionable mental status, blackouts (so maybe she's hiding stuff from herself and us)... but I think there's a risk involved in comparing one's unpublished book to something that's sold quite that successfully. Still, I won't rule it out.

Oh, and I'm still waiting on the arrival of Upstairs in the Crazy House, another memoir from a psychiatric survivor.

If any of these titles or descriptions conjures up the names of other books you think I should take a look at, let me know!




—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

My third book is deep in tertiary drafts, and I'm seeking more beta readers for feedback. It is provisionally titled Within the Box and is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
Derek is genderqueer, or nonbinary -- or rather that's likely what Derek would call himself in 2023 -- but it's 1982, and 23-year-old Derek is finding it a challenge to explain to people. He views himself as needing help becoming a better communicator. His parents view him as having a drug and alcohol problem.

They reach a compromise: he'll check himself into a very modern upscale facility that promises to help people work on all their issues. It's strictly voluntary. “But we’d want you to give it a real try”, his Dad says. “Don’t stalk out the first time you think there’s some policy or some person that isn’t perfect. You won’t get anything out of it unless you go in intending to get something out of it.”

Dr. Barnes and his staff think Derek is in denial about his situation. He insists he doesn't have a drug or alcohol problem, but he's never been able to keep a job or complete any projects, including two attempts at college and a more recent attempt to complete nurse's training. And he's constantly deflecting, bringing in social issues and political theories. “You can’t go out and fix the world and solve its problems when you haven’t dealt with the mess in your own life”, Barnes tells him. “I think you’re just afraid to confront your own worst enemy, because unfortunately he isn’t out there with expectations and roles, he’s right there where you are.”

But Derek is finding the facility heavy-handed and coercive. They've gotten off to a bad start -- nobody asks his reasons for coming there or what he hopes to get out of the program. He thinks being a heterosexual femme is relevant to why he's had difficulties fitting in socially and doing well. That and the resulting isolation which have left him deprived of the easy interactive social skill-set that most people have. He wants to work on that, but the institutional staff seem bent on working on him in ways he isn't consenting to.

The other patients in the program don't warm to him immediately; he's disrupting the program and they're also being judged by the staff on how appropriately they react when someone behaves disruptively. Derek watches and observes. “Therapy here is all about residents proving that they can be an obedient part of Dr. Barnes’ echo chamber. Anyone who doesn’t echo doesn’t advance to the higher levels”, he says.

Within the Box is a psychological suspense tale. Derek can't be sure they aren't right; maybe he seized on this weird notion about gender because he so badly wanted an answer other than "horrible unlikeable person with a hideous personality and atrocious social skills" for why he's been reviled and hated, and it's really a defense mechanism, like they say. And the reader is invited along to wonder who is right, and whether the institution is benign or awful, whether Derek is arrogant and stubborn or bravely resistant.

Arching over all of this ambivalence is the issue of safety: if, indeed, the institution is unduly coercive, and Derek is openly resistant to them, is he being paranoid about worrying about what they might do in response, or is he on safe grounds because, as Dr. Barnes himself said, “You all know you can leave any time you want"?

Within the Box. 72,000 words, nonfiction, a personal account (memoir) rendered in the style of entertainment fiction.

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

My third book is deep in tertiary drafts, and I'm seeking more beta readers for feedback. It is provisionally titled Within the Box and is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
I'm doing a fifth pass (give or take) of Within the Box, revamping some confusing or inexact paragraphs and redoing dialog that doesn't quite fit the character who is speaking at the time.

Here's one example from fairly early in the story — the character Gary developed into a coarser and more impatient person than I'd portrayed him here in his first appearance, and I finally took notice of that.

BEFORE

“The important thing”, Gary tells me, “is that you want a fresh start. It’s your life. You’ve got to reclaim it. We want to make this a safe place for you to rethink what you came in here with, which may be counterproductive, and consider everything anew. I like my work here. It is my job to work with the people who have been assigned to me and help them let go of habitual ways of thinking that aren’t helping them get on with their lives."

AFTER

“The important thing”, Gary tells me, “is that you want a fresh start. It’s your life, dude. You gotta reclaim it. You got a safe place here to rethink what you came in with, stuff that ain’t working for you, and find yourself some new paths. I like my work here, man. I take the people who get assigned to me and help them let go of what’s holding them back and give them a push in the right direction."

One of the themes that emerges in the book is that the main character Derek speaks the way he writes, and is thought by some to be putting on airs, and by others to be intellectualizing to avoid his real issues. I, of course, am Derek, and I do tend to use language in this way, and unfortunately tend to stick overly-intellectual-sounding sentences into the mouths of many of my characters. It's okay if it's Dr. Barnes, because he has a definitely double standard by which it's appropriate for him to speak that way, but it just doesn't work if the other characters do it too. So without making them sound unintelligent, I need to make them sound colloquial and their speech patterns normative, so that Derek's can stick out better.


For a second example, here's a bad description from later in the book, a combination of overly convoluted sentences and general lack of clarity. That's a different problem. I, as author, know what I intended to say. Sometimes that gets in the way of me realizing I haven't said it very well.

BEFORE

I dealt with Mountain View by starting my own local chapter of Mental Patients’ Liberation Front, and even though they were utterly coercive and we had no rights to speak of, I managed to get not only most of the patients in agreement that we should just listen to each other and be mutually supportive and reject the treatment they were subjecting us to, but also enough of the staff members, to the point that it disrupted their functioning and they decided I was a rabble raising psychiatric rights activist and booted me out like they’d caught me trespassing.

AFTER

I dealt with Mountain View by starting my own local chapter of Mental Patients’ Liberation Front, and even though they were utterly coercive and we had no rights to speak of, I managed to get most of the patients in agreement that we should just listen to each other and be mutually supportive, and reject the treatment they were subjecting us to. And I also got the support of a significant percent of the staff members, to the point that it polarized the staff and disrupted their functioning. Upper echelon staff eventually decided I was a rabble raising psychiatric rights activist and booted me out as if they’d caught me trespassing.




The procrastinating thing, meanwhile... I should really be working on a pitch letter, and perhaps sample chapters, synopsis, an 'about the author' paragraph, and the rest of the things I need to assemble in preparation for querying lit agents and seeing if I can get this book published.

I haven't done any of that.

It's certainly not a bad thing that I continue to polish the manuscript. It needs it. And I don't have any compelling need to be in a hurry, I suppose. But neither of those things are the reason I haven't made any effort to put together a querying package. I'm procrastinating because I detest querying.

Well, I've at least given some thought to how to position the book. From early on, I've viewed it as a psychological suspense tale, one that just happens to involve an LGBTQIA+ person as the main character (Derek being genderqueer), but where his unusual gender identity is not the central focus of the book. It's constantly there but the book is much more about whether or not he needs help, and of what kind, and whether or not the institution can provide it or if Derek is spot-on correct in seeing the place as coercive and oppressive despite its modern facade and claims to being state-of-the-art rehabilitative therapy.

That should shed a lot of light on what the components need to focus on. What I need to focus on. Well... I'll get to it...

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

My third book is deep in tertiary drafts, and I'm seeking more beta readers for feedback. It is provisionally titled Within the Box and is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
Memoirs written by mad people — describing what it's like to wrestle with the emotional and cognitive disturbances we call "mental illness", or the experiences with psychiatric treatment, or the associated stigma and the sense of having become something unmentionable — seldom cover the entire territory.

There are those books that invite us along for a glimpse of the descent into madness, such as Hannah Green's I Never Promised You a Rose Garden; there are the ones that focus more on what it's like to need help so badly and to instead be subjected to the grim and harsh realities of psychiatric incarceration, such as Janet Gotkin's Too Much Anger, Too Many Tears or Susannah Kaysen's Girl, Interrupted.

Then there are the more militant books written more as condemnations of psychiatric oppression, like Leonard Roy Frank's "The Frank Papers" from back in the Madness Network News days, or Huey Freeman's Judge, Jury & Executioner. Sometimes the latter folks include a description of The Movement — mad people's liberation, the consumers and survivors and ex-patients banding together both to fight for our rights and to be the support network and therapeutic safety net that the psychiatric system has been unable to provide us — such as you find in Kate Millet's The Loony Bin Trip or Judi Chamberlin's On Our Own.

A lot of the militant / movement-oriented stories do not come from people who were seeking or needing help, but just had it imposed on them anyway whether they liked it or not. So, as you might expect, there's a lot of focus on the right to say "no" and be left in peace. My own writings have mostly fallen into this category.

Mary Elizabeth Van Pelt's 2010 book In Silence I Speak: My Journey Through Madness provides one of the less common testimonies, the story of a person who fell down into the pit of real mental and emotional turmoil and truly needed help, but for whom the help was at best a mixed bag until she found community and connectedness with others who were in the same boat...and from there, became acquainted with the movement and increasingly committed to the user-run self-help model for alternative therapy.

Hers is as fervent a callout to the movement and its ideals as anything written by the militant leave-us-alone contingent. Of particular interest, she testifies to what it's like to work in the mental health system as a person who is known to have a psychiatric diagnosis herself. The attitudes and expectations, the overt double standards, these all paint a graphic picture of how the professionals in the psychiatric system tend to view us: as very different from themselves, as impaired people, as people of a different caste whom one would not invite to a dinner with one's real colleagues, as people who are automatically disqualified from being on the actual staff because we can't have such people with such ruined minds working here, as people whose time and energy has no intrinsic worth, so their contributions need not be compensated.



In Silence I Speak is a slim volume that packs a lot into just 128 pages. Van Pelt recapitulates her experience of an aspect of the situation and then moves on to another subtopic. Some sections were definitely richer, more fleshed out and punchier than others, and these are the places where In Silence I Speak is at its best. The sense of disorientation and being unplugged and lost is well-provided in "Psychiatric Interlude"; and the new hopes arising from mutual support and connection are very evocative in "A Time of Growth and Change". She details the sense of betrayal and her frustration with the obliviousness of her professional colleagues in "Flying Beyond Institutional Walls" and "Beyond the World of Madness".

The thinnest and most perfunctory sections of the book are the early ones describing her initial descent into dysfunctional patterns. Whether out of a reluctance to relinquish her remaining privacy or, as she hints, because it's still a painful place to go back to and relive long enough to capture on paper, we aren't given a really visceral sense of what was happening to her and how it felt.

But in the emergence into the peer support and psychiatric rights community, her tale is compelling, in large part because it is so effectively prefaced by her description of what it was like to try to provide those kinds of services and be a participant and colleague within the medical-model version that the peer services are an alternative to.


Mary Elizabeth Van Pelt. In Silence I Speak: My Journey Through Madness. Paperback and Kindle editions. Albuquerque NM: Mercury Heartlink 2010

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

My third book is deep in second draft, and I'm seeking more beta readers for feedback. It is provisionally titled Within the Box and is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
My third book, Within the Box, is about a gender-variant person in a rehab facility. And rehabilitation is approached as a type of psychiatric practice, with the facility being run by psychiatrically trained personnel. So the book is also about the clash between a gender-variant person who doesn't think they have something wrong with them, and an impersonal psychiatric practice that considers all of its clients to be pathologically impaired.

A lot of LGBTQIA+ people get seen by psychiatric services. If you don't already have a politically critical perspective on the profession, it is time for you to develop one. Even if you have found some good in their services.


To start with, the psychiatric establishment is fundamentally conservative: that which is typical and normative is defined as that which is healthy. Different is intrinsically regarded as pathological. Clinical names are affixed to each of the ways in which people seem to follow a different pattern than the mainstream pattern.

This works against you on two different levels, simultaneously: first of all, every one of your decisions, preferences, tastes, priorities, and so forth are subject to being evaluated for being different from those of your peers, and considered to be possible symptoms of some unfortunate condition that they watch people for.

Then, on a broader level, they often regard a specific difference, such as what they call "gender identity dysphoria", as a pathology. Until 1973, "homosexuality" was tagged as a mental disorder. It is true that they removed it from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) and thus no longer define it as a psychiatric ailment, but many individual psychiatrists continued to believe it to be so (since that was how they were trained). With gender, being trans used to be conceptualized officially as a disorder; then they shifted to only defining it as a pathology if it was making you miserable. But again, attitudes often linger behind official definitions.

People in the LGBTQIA+ community often turn to psychiatrists because they are seeking help with coping with the friction between themselves and an unaccepting society. This is sometimes very specific and official help, such as the requirement that in order to obtain medical transition, a person needs to be assessed and under the ongoing care of a psychiatrist.

Their role as gatekeepers and enforcers of the most stereotypical gender norms for people desiring to transition has been commmented on often. But the psychiatric profession serves a larger and sneakier role as excuse-maker for patterns of life that don't need any excuse because there's nothing wrong with the person in question.

If you aren't particularly happy and satisfied with your lot in society, that does not mean something is wrong with you.

If you are different from the normative, that does not mean there has to be some underlying brain difference or chromosomal variation that made that happen, which "makes it okay" since it isn't your fault. Because if there's nothing wrong with it, it doesn't require an excuse.

What do you have on your desk that you can safely toss without doing any damage? Maybe a box of paper clips, or that handful of dice you use for that game? Select a spot on your floor, and then toss your items at that spot as a target. You see how they spray all around and some of the individual items are pretty far from the target? But you didn't throw them differently than the others. Their different landing position doesn't have a "cause" or a "reason" different from what happened to the other items. When our differences are tagged for investigation into "what caused it?", the implication is that our difference is a wrongness in need of explanation that the normative ones don't need.

Think about it.

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

My third book is deep in second draft, and I'm seeking more beta readers for feedback. It is provisionally titled Within the Box and is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
Spoiler alert: if you're in Amateur Writers of Long Island you should not read this yet.

Excerpt from my work in progress, Within the Box
---

A scenario in which Derek Turner, the main character, has been unexpectedly detained on an involuntary basis. Derek (me, 1st person) is in this place because I agreed I had, as they put it, difficulties engaging and relating to other people to the degree I wished to do so. The reason for that was that I'd just recently come out. But not as something anyone had ever heard of. The term "genderqueer" didn't exist in 1982. The institution wasn't to my liking and after giving it my best try, earnestly, I had finally decided it was not for me and asked to leave, as I was a voluntary patient. Instead I was whisked away to a seclusion room. I'm locked in isolation with a specific nurse (Angela) assigned to me. Now finally someone shows up to support my effort to leave.

---


The outside door buzzes and swings open. A compact man with black-rimmed eyeglasses in a business suit and carrying a briefcase enters, escorted by facility orderlies who remain at the door as he walks on in.

“Derek Turner?”, he calls out. I wave. He comes over. Hands Angela and me each a business card. “I am with Texas Mental Hygiene Services. I’ll need some privacy to confer with my client, ma’am, so if you could wait outside?” Angela disappears through the door.

“Robert Tally”, he says, and shakes my hand. “How are you holding up?”

“I’ve had better days, but worse ones too. I just want to get out of this place. I sure am glad to see you! No one will tell me anything!”

“Well, first things first”, he tells me, and takes out a one-page document from his briefcase. “This is a 72 hour letter, which officially notifies Elk Meadow of your intent to leave. The law says that voluntary patients can’t be held for longer than that unless a court hearing finds that they need to be converted to involuntary status. Do you understand what I’m saying so far?”

“I’ve heard about 72 hour letters, but they’ve always told us in here that we could leave at any time, don’t they have to make good on that if they promised us that?”

“Unfortunately, no. What’s in the law is that they can hold you 72 hours. That’s from the time you make it official, which this document does, once we file it. Now, they can contest it, and they’ve indicated that they will. So this forces them to file a motion to contest your release and put you on involuntary hold. Let me know if I need to explain any of that before we go any further.”

“I sign this and you submit it, and then if they don’t file a motion, they have to let me go after 72 hours. But they’re saying that they will, they’re going to try to keep me here against my will.”

Robert Tally nods.

“Why? What’s their excuse for saying I can’t leave?

“I’ll get to that in a moment, but I want to cover the procedural stuff first, I want you to have a clear understanding of how this all works. An observational period is required in any contested release where the facility requests an involuntary hold. The hospital is going to argue that they’ve had you here and therefore the required observation has already occurred, and they’ll submit their impression of you. We will try to convince the judge that there should be a separate and independent observation, for the sake of neutrality, and that would be at a public state-run psychiatric facility.”

“I always thought being locked in a state hospital meant you get pumped full of Thorazine and stuck in a corner to drool”

“Well, they won’t tolerate any nonsense or clowning around, that’s for sure, they’re understaffed and don’t have time for any of that. But they don’t have a vested interest in keeping you locked up, so if you keep your nose clean for 72 hours, they’d probably say they don’t see any reason you should be retained involuntarily.”

“Yeah, okay, I can do low profile and obedient, if they don’t automatically shoot everyone up with drugs.” I swallow. I’m not good at low profile and obedient.

“The standard we have to concern ourselves with officially is ‘danger to self or others’. To hold you on an involuntary basis, the law says you have to be determined to be a danger. Unless they have any justification for saying you’ve attacked people or threatened them, that’s usually going to be ‘danger to self’.”

“I’ve read my chart, I swiped it and read the whole thing, at least how it was at the time, and it says I’m paranoid schizophrenic. And it’s full of notes saying my behavior is inappropriate, but nothing about self-harm. I did do something that they might try to make sound like was more dangerous than it actually was, I climbed up through the acoustic tiles into the ceiling crawl space. I was looking to see if that could be a way out.”

“They always introduce chart notes and they’ll always try to make the case that the patient lacks good judgment and will make bad decisions and be a danger to themself. Plus, the doctor will say ‘Well, I am a highly trained professional psychiatrist and my opinion is that this person will harm themself if we don’t hold on to them and treat them in here’, you can count on that happening. But the state has limited resources, so that’s your best bet, that the judge doesn’t see any reason to waste them on someone who isn’t really causing any problems.”

I sign the 72 hour letter and date it. Talley shakes my hand and departs.

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

My third book is deep in second draft, and I'm seeking more beta readers for feedback. It is provisionally titled Within the Box and is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir. Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)


Day Eleven in a substance abuse rehab facility. Excuse me, a multi-component self-growth therapy center, and it had been the other aspects -- "social skills and communication skills and how you integrate into your social environment" -- that had lured me into signing myself into the place, not the substance abuse rehab stuff.

I'm trying to come out. It's 1982 and the terminology available for coming out as what would later be called genderqueer or nonbinary does not exist yet, so I wish for more fluent social skills, to be a speaker, to have an influence on people and affect their thinking, you know?

Unfortunately, I find them heavy-handed and authoritarian.

It's not quite that I'm not getting anything out of the experience -- I like the class they call "psychodrama" and also the informal chatting with the other resident patients. But I'm not broken and I didn't come in here to turn myself over to these folks to let them "fix" me.

One thing that's gotten on my nerves by this time is their insistence that we be honest and open about what we feel and think, but the staff don't share what their actual feelings and reactions are -- they're instead constantly telling or reacting according to what they think we need to hear.



WITHIN THE BOX, by Allan D. Hunter (work in progress)

--- excerpt begins ---


I’m idly hovering in the vicinity of our unit’s nurses’ station. It’s not that I’ve made close friends of all the nurses; more that I find something reassuring about the rhythms and professionalism at this intersection of medical and office work. I hear the click clack of the Selectric typewriters, the booble-booble-boop of the multi-line office phones, the muted chatter of people doing their tasks. One of the nurses opens a cardboard box and unpacks bandages and cotton balls and carries them to where they stock them.

I watch Nurse Vicky signal to the other nurses to handle the phones, then go back past the racks of medicines and syringes and stuff and into the staff bathroom. She closes the door and I hear the faint chink of the lock turning. We don’t have locks on our own bathroom doors. Or our bedroom doors for that matter. It’s not for us to decide to put a door between us and the rest of this place. I’ve had bonus privacy they hadn’t officially planned on giving me, due to being without a roommate all this time, but that’s soon coming to an end.

I stare for a little while longer, thinking.

I often think better when I’m in motion. I begin doing my corridor laps. Down towards Unit One. Right turn. Across to Unit Three. Back up and past the cafeteria to Unit Four. Over again to Unit Two. Eyes track my progress everywhere I go. I see the nurses lift their heads from their paperwork as I blast by them with my long strides. Down to Unit One again. Past the hallway that goes to the entrance foyer. Right turn at the end of Unit Three. Sailing past the piano. Right turn and the approach to Unit Two again.

But this time, instead of continuing down the corridor, I make a sudden left into the nurse’s station itself. Nurse Vicky looks up in belated surprise as I stride past her, still moving at my brisk hiking pace, my fingers snagging my own chart out of the chromium wire rack as I zoom by. I continue full bore past the medicines and supply shelves and into the currently empty nurse’s station bathroom. I immediately whirl and lock the door behind me.

I close the toilet lid to make a seat. Flip to page one and begin reading. Intake sheet. Address and social security and date of birth and all that. Flip. MMPI interpretation. Rorschach interpretation. Signs of confused mental processing. Antisocial elements.

Flip. Dr. James Barnes signature on my diagnosis. Paranoid schizophrenic with delusional content. DSM-III code numbers following that.

Flip.

BANG. BANG. BANG. “Open up, Derek! What are you doing in there? You are not supposed to be in this bathroom. I need you to come out of there!” BANG. BANG.

Nurse’s notes, dated timed and signed. “Continues to display inappropriate behavior.” “Withdrawn. Hostile.” “Still not engaging with others.” “Very little affect, uncommunicative.”

BANG. BANG. BANG. “Derek?? Did you take your chart? I need you to give that back” BANG. BANG. “Right now! Open this door!”

Flip. Group notes. Psychodrama notes. Individual counseling notes. “Still rejects all opportunities to integrate.” “Still continues to display inappropriate behavior” “Constantly and deliberately uncooperative.”

There are many more voices now. Male voices. Mark. Gary. “If you open up, you won’t be in any trouble.” “If you don’t open this door you’re going to be in so much trouble.” “C’mon now. I don’t have patience for this!” BANG. BANG. KICK!! “What do you want me to do, he’s got the door locked” “Go see if there’s a key for opening it from the outside” BANG. BANG.

“Derek, are you in there reading your chart?.” Dr. Barnes’ voice.

“Yes I am”, I reply.

“Derek, you shouldn’t be doing that. It could be very disturbing for you. These are medical evaluations that you don’t have the training to understand!”

Flip. Drug tests. Urine. Blood. Flip. Weight. Blood pressure. Respiration. Temp.

Flip. I, Edward Turner, relationship father, do authorize Dr. James Barnes to involuntarily impose any treatments deemed necessary for the care of Derek Turner, dated and signed.

Flip.

When I’m done reading, I unlatch the bathroom door, hand my chart to Dr. Barnes with a smile, and walk back out of the nurses’ station.

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.

My third book is deep in second draft, and I'm seeking more beta readers for feedback. It is provisionally titled Within the Box and is set in a psychiatric/rehab facility and is focused on self-determination and identity. Chronologically, it fits between the events in GenderQueer and those described in Guy in Women's Studies; unlike the other two, it is narrowly focused on events in a one-month timeframe and is more of a suspense thriller, although like the other two is also a nonfiction memoir.Contact me if you're interested.






Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both published books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
Hi! I've been churning away on my third book, the working title of which I've changed to Within the Box (previously: In the Box). Here's a scene I'm sharing, where I'm sitting down one-to-one with my assigned personal counselor Mark Raybourne.

The overall backdrop here is that this is a rehab facility; my status is voluntary; I went AWOL once, bored and less than thrilled with the place, and since then I've been barred from going outdoors for recreation, so to get exercise I've taken to making circuits of the long hallways of the institution, walking laps around the rectangle that they form in this sprawling facility.


-----

“Thanks for being flexible about the time”, Mark says. He had had something else going on that conflicted with our regular individual counseling session, so he’d asked if we could meet early afternoon. He knows my schedule, and it’s not like I was likely to have penciled in a dentist’s visit or a wine tasting, but nice of him to ask me instead of telling me.

“We need to talk”, he tells me. “About your excursions up and down the hall. It’s attracting a lot of attention.”

I nod. Yes, and?

“Most people aren’t comfortable in a social situation if everyone else thinks they’re behaving oddly. So it’s not just that you’re walking around and around like a robot, it’s also the fact that you don’t show any sign of recognizing how odd this looks to everyone else. A lot of people on the staff are saying this shows a worrisome lack of insight, and we’re all concerned that you’re in some type of emotional turmoil”.

“That’s interesting”, I reply. “My nursing instructor brought that up to me once. I had just had a patient die on me while I was away at lunch, and she had me clean him up for the family to come in and have a final visit. So I was still in the patient’s room when they all came trooping in, a minister with a Bible and three or four middle-aged people and an older woman with a cane. They didn’t speak to me, so I didn’t speak to them. And the minister said a prayer and we all stood there like that for awhile. My nursing instructor said they all kept looking over at me, wondering why I was there in the room, and she found it weird that I didn’t react to that at all. She said they clearly expected me to leave so the family could be with the man in privacy. But they were all standing between me and the door and it felt like it would be more disruptive to push past them, and I didn’t mind being there, he’d been my patient for all the good I’d done him, and it felt disrespectful to dash off like I have more important things to do than stand here honoring the dead. So, yeah, I can be pretty oblivious to being the focus of attention if nobody’s actually saying anything.”

“Doesn’t it occur to you that nobody else goes on a purposeless march and makes a spectacle of themself in the corridor? Everyone here is trying to get better. Healthier. Nobody wants to look like they’re having some kind of breakdown! So either you really are experiencing a breakdown or there’s something fundamentally wrong, that you don’t care how people perceive you!”

“I’ve been blocked from going out for recreation. I was already not getting enough exercise, so if the hospital’s going to keep me indoors, I’m going to get my recreation this way. Simple as that. If nobody’s going to bother to just ask me why I’m doing it, it must not matter much to them.”

“Well, people are usually reluctant to point out that someone’s behaving strangely. They don’t want to embarrass the other person”.

“I haven’t found that to be true. All my life people have made a point of coming up to me and telling me I’m strange.”

“I was hoping you’d give some more thought to it maybe not being in your best interests to not care what other people think about you. I spoke to you about this just the other day. Clearly, it didn’t seem to have any effect, because next thing I know, you’re out here pretending you’re a wind-up toy instead of a human being!”

“I actually have been giving it quite a bit of thought. It’s an interesting topic. What you need to realize is that I’ve spent a lifetime having people react to me as if I’m weird. They mostly weren’t very nice about it, and mocked me and made fun of me and called me names. I learned not to care because how else would you keep them from getting to you? I was never going to blend in.”

I pause for a moment, reminded of a line of thought I’d pursued once or twice before. “That was less true for my sister. Jan didn’t easily fit in everywhere. Whenever we moved, or changed school systems, I think she had to work at it to make new friends, get people to accept her, avoid being the kid that other people leave out or talk about and make fun of. I think she put some effort into tucking in any odd corners so people couldn’t see. Popularity was important to her; I don’t mean she was super popular, most popular girl in the class or anything, but popular enough. But that wasn’t an option for me. I wasn’t a kid who was seen as having something about them that was a little different. I was the kid that everyone in the school heard about from the other kids before they ever saw me. I had a reputation that had stuff that people made up about me added to what was already there, and being stared at was not something I was going to be able to avoid. I remember kids from other classrooms bringing their friends with them to point me out through the open classroom door, you know, ‘See, over there, that’s him’. So I have a lifetime of training that’s made it pretty much invisible to me. That means even if I agree with you, which I partly do, by the way, that it probably costs me certain things, that’s like saying ‘Gee, if you’re moving to Spain, you’d be better off if you spoke Spanish instead of English’, you can say it and it may be true but you don’t just decide to switch languages and the next day you’re speaking Spanish. Just because you don’t notice any difference in my behavior doesn’t mean I’m not thinking about what you said”.

“What does speaking Spanish have to do with walking around and around and around in the hallway?”

I sigh.

-----

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves. Hardback versions to follow, stay tuned for details.



Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
I made one major structural change in my WIP (book three, In the Box): I converted it all from first person past tense to first person present tense.

The precipitating reason was that the internal monologues, the main character Derek's stream-of-consciousness stuff, was awkward to write. Obviously Derek isn't thinking in the past tense. I had written some of it in this kind of format:


Derek thought to himself, "Seriously, do I need this? It's been a long day"


In other places, I used italics instead:


The administrative staffer handed me another stack of forms and said, "Fill this out".

Whoa. The name of every prescription drug and when it was prescribed, going back ten years?? I'm supposed to just rattle that shit off from the top of my head?



Then there was the author's voice, narrator's voice. The book is autobiographical (I am the "Derek" character from my books; I change all the names but it's nonfiction memoir through and through). That meant I was sometimes writing some thoughts about the events being described but doing so as Allan Hunter, author, and that was being rendered in past tense along with the rest of the narrative. But distinguishing between that voice and the internal monologue of character Derek, my 23-year-old self who was in the situation at the time, was often complicated and challenging. Or arbitrary and random.

I realized this would all be so much smoother and integrated if it were written in present tense. I experimented and quickly found that I liked not distinguishing between Allan-author's voice and Derek-character's internal thoughts. It felt more intimate, with a single unified me telling you this story about what happened to me.

The other thing it did was enhance the sense of immediacy.

The goal with this story from the start was to immerse the reader in a rather claustrophobic suspenseful environment and convey as visceral a sense as I can of what it was like.

Is like. Be here now with me, hop on board and fasten your seat belt. The sections I did the experimental rewrite on did feel more immersive.

So I plowed through rewriting it up to the point I'd gotten to, casting it all in present tense.

For the first three or four days after that, as I went on to write new sections, I kept accidentally reverting back to the more conventional past tense narrative. He said, she said, bell rang, I walked down the corridor.

But it's been happening less and less often.

It's not that I've never written present tense before, but I've mostly done so in short stories. I've done a lot of interesting things in short stories. I once wrote a science fiction short that was all in second person: You wake up in an almost featureless room. You rub your eyes...

Novel-sized endeavors, though, for me at least, involve a lot of contemplation of the next chunk I intend to write, jotting down notes for the next few sequences, imagining the dialog or the descriptive narrative in my head while walking or cooking or whatever, then sitting down to it and pouring it into the word processor screen. So that makes it different from a short story, where I would most typically sit down and write the whole thing all in one shot.

All those broken-up writing intervals, different sessions at the computer, mean my regular habits tend to reassert themselves and knock me out of any variant groove I'm attempting. (This has also been a challenge for me with regards to my attempt to write the entire day, each day, instead of hopping out of a scene after making a plot-propelling point and skipping ahead to the next example situation or meaningful event. Part of the desire for immediacy and claustrophobia, but so hard to stick to it. (No, wait, that last conversation would have ended around two. I need to fill the rest of the afternoon before ending up in the dining room).


Anyway, it all seems to be working. I'm spewing a respectable amount of text onto screen and it's adding up.

Please tell me I'm not going to decide to write my next one in second person plural future tense or something...


—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves. Hardback versions to follow, stay tuned for details.



Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
Haven't been blogging lately... fell down the author's rabbit hole. I'm 37,000 words deep into book three :)


Here's an excerpt -- it's a flashback sequence in which I'm thinking back to junior high days and another misfit named Malcolm, who hung out with me in seventh grade.

The narrator's voice is me-at-23 thinking back, so if the analysis at the end comes across as somewhat unsophisticated and even a tinge homophobic, that's intentional.



----- from In the Box, "July 28, 1982 (Day Ten)" ----

Nobody in our high school was out as gay. At least as far as I know. This was circa 1974-1977. Small town. Esoteric town, to be sure. But not terribly safe to be different from the categories of people available to be categorized as. There was no role for Out Gay Guy. Anyone opting for the role would have had to have created it from scratch. I have a strong sense that I can relate to that.

I met Malcolm in seventh grade at Valdosta Junior High. Earlier, 1972. We’d been in some youth church group which is where he knew me from. I don’t know, Methodist Summer Youth Program or equivalent. He did one of those “Hey, I recognize you” things, and although I had that facial agnosia thing going on for me, where I’m slow to recognize people out of context, I thought I’d for sure seen him before, so when he explained, it fit.

Malcolm liked to talk to me, and early on seemed to find it amusing to try to shock me.

“Let me tell you about these people” was Malcolm’s general presentation.

“These people like feet”, he’d tell me. “Like they’re hot for it, you know? And they hang out around libraries...”

Malcolm, I think in retrospect, probably quickly reconfigured his estimate of my sophistication and experience. Way downward.

“Do you know Betsy?”, he asked me. “She’s in our classroom for homeroom. Do you think she’s cute?”

I always had, since fourth grade. We all had. Betsy had it.

“Well would you ever want to stick your hand inside her skirt and feel around?”, he posed.

“Umm, no, yeeck, I’ve known her for a long time, that’s creepy”.

Malcolm insisted, “She would. You don’t believe me? She would. She’d let you do that. Or somebody. But it could be you.”

I was in seventh grade, mind you. The concept that the girls might have these same feelings for us like we did for them, I mean interest in the shapes and textures and wanting to touch or perhaps to be touched like that....this was all new information, or alleged information, all under consideration. With a lot of rather intense interest, yeah, I wanted to know. Did I ever.

But the way Malcolm was describing it back then... he was like a bridge person, honestly, echoing a lot of the things I’d overheard the boy boys say about girls; and still at the same time he made more sense to me. Nobody’d ever asked me about whether I’d want to put my hands up inside some girls’ skirt or not. Not that directly. Definitely not Betsy Johnson. Or maybe Betsy Johnson. It really changes how you think about it if you think maybe they want it to happen. Malcolm was saying the girls liked it. That would be wonderful. It would be so awful if it was just me, being a pervert, a creep, wanting to touch girl parts. Which was how I still worried, down deep inside, might be the case. So of course I never wanted anyone to know.

Yeah...so., Malcolm. We hung out during recess at Valdosta Junior High. I really didn’t have many friends so someone who wanted to hang out with me and be company, that was nice.

One of the interesting kinds of people Malcolm told me about at some point were boys who got fantasies about other boys, and wanted to touch them. Wanted to do sex with them, he told me.

My seventh grade self looked back blankly. I held up my hands and banged my middle fingers, left and right, into each other, tip to tip. I told Malcom, “That’s not possible, it wouldn’t work!”

Malcolm shook his head. “One of them goes up the butt of the other one. Like being with a girl. It feels a lot the same”

I ewwed a face at him. Gut reaction.

“Well they also lick and suck. With mouth and tongue”. Malcolm looked back at me, confident and gentle. “I’d like to do that if you’d let me”.

“Yecch no”, I replied.



So that was my first real-life first-hand experience of gay guys. Totally not some creepy invasive thing where one guy has a lot of power over the other. Or some creepy salivating begging person who just seems pathetic to you. Or any other stereotype, really. We were both fascinated by difference. He had a lot of interesting tales to tell. I hadn’t thought about sexual variation as a plot device for a story, but yeah it was intrinsically fascinating. Got me thinking more about where the way I was might fit in to all that.

He hit on me. Yes, that happened. He didn’t act like I had no choice, or he was entitled, or fawn at me like oh please, I need this from you. He was okay with it not being something I wanted, and we stayed friends and it totally didn’t matter. Or I assume that’s how it was for him. I have no reason to think otherwise. He was totally non-sulky about it and never brought it up again.


—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves. Hardback versions to follow, stay tuned for details.



Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
I have notes for a third book. I haven't been working on it. Or even them, the notes.

I admit I'm thinking about it.

Writing books is somewhat addictive on its own. I like the books I've cranked out so far, and to have a notion for a new one? Yeah, there's a certain lure to it.

The flip side, to be blunt, is that neither of the first two books obtained many readers.

That's been really disapointing. The first book (GenderQueer), in particular, was written with the sense that I was speaking for an entire identity, and I wrote it to achieve recognition for us. I mean, yes, there was some portion of my motivation that had more to do with wanting my own personal story to be told, or with my sense that my story was entertaining and should engross readers. But let's say 90% of my motivation in writing it was that I hadn't had any such book available to me as a resource when I was 14 or 17 or 21, and nobody should have to work all this mess out for themselves and feel all alone with it.

The second book (That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class) also had a socially relevant message or two, although to a larger extent than with the first book, I wrote it for personal reasons, to explain what I'd attempted and how it had gone down. And to have a platform from which to argue about specific types of feminist theory. Let's say 70% of my motivation was feeling that this content needed to be put into writing and the rest was about just telling my story and feeling like it was a a good tale to tell.

So because they both had prominent "mission statement" elements, it's been very discouraging that I didn't get more readers than I did. I don't mean I expected to get listed as a bestseller, but I admit I was hoping for maybe 15,000 copies sold, or 23,000, or 10,000. What I got was more like 100.

---

The third book is more of a thriller story. Chronologically it takes place between book 1 and book 2. I had come out as a heterosexual femme sissy male, but had not as of yet chosen to major in women's studies. My parents were worried about me.

I was convinced by my family to give psychiatric treatment a second chance. "That place you went to before was a snake pit... locked up with bars in the windows and locks on the doors and wearing hospital gowns. This place is all modern, and focused on helping clients communicate. They look at your diet, your personal hangups, your relationship with drugs [yes I know you don't think you have a drug problem, but you know your Dad and I do], your plans...please try it? If you decide it isn't for you, they promise you can just leave. You know we're all so sorry about what you went through, that wasn't right".

At that time in my life I was extremely frustrated in my attempts to become a gender activist and speak out about my situation as a social phenomenon. The word "genderqueer" didn't exist yet but I'd essentially formulated the notion and was trying to draw attention to it.

---

I want to try doing book 3 as a thriller. To make each day a chapter and give a sense of nonstop passage of time between the time I checked myself in and the time it all came to an end.


I still am not committed to doing it. Probably nobody's going to read it. It won't be as socially relevant as either of the previous two. The writing challenge will be harder for me.


—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves. Hardback versions to follow, stay tuned for details.



Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for both books.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class takes place predominantly in three venues: a facility for homeless people with psychiatric histories located on the grounds of Creedmoor Psychiatric Hospital, a SUNY college campus in nearby Nassau County, and, later, a larger SUNY campus farther out on the island.

At the story's open, I -- via my alias in the story, Derek Turner -- am living in the facility while commuting to and from the first SUNY campus where I'm taking my courses.



Creedmoor Hospital is a relic of the days of massive long-term (mostly permanent) institutionalization. It's not a building, it's a campus, with dozens and dozens of buildings sprawled out across Queens Village and neighboring communities in eastern Queens. The buildings look like medieval fortresses, with massive brickwork and imperiously angular faces and rooflines, bars in the windows and fences around everything.

Inside, the general design reflects a primary consideration for being able to monitor a lot of people from a minimum number of observation points: patients' living spaces tended to be aggregate, with the exception of a sprinkling of isolation rooms, and dining and day rooms were also large open areas. Professional offices were small and tended towards heavy metal doors without windows.

At one time, the institution ran its own support services such as medical and laundry and automotive and other equipment repair, perhaps even its own crematorium, operating as a separate entity from the surrounding suburban communities.

Covered walkways led from building to building, and in many cases underground tunnels connected them as well.

By the time I was placed there as a homeless person, operations had scaled back considerably, with many of these large buildings no longer in use. The east half of Building 4 was the location of the Queens Mens Shelter, where -- in contrast to most other aggregate homeless shelters in the city -- I could lay claim to a bed within a room (even if the room had no door, let alone a locking one) and leave things behind and come back and mostly depend on them still being there. There were lockers and we could store things. It was inhumane, abusive and violent, but the ability to retain some paperwork and some continuity of connection with other people gave me options I didn't have in the shelter system generically.

Meanwhile, the other side of Building 4, the west half, was being refurbished, with walls knocked down and new ones put up and everything repainted and linoleum put down on the floors, and a less prisonlike appearance attempted. This was where the Residential Care Center for Adults was being installed, and along with perhaps 70% of the other residents of the Queens Mens' Shelter I was successfully screened into the program and assigned a case worker.

We were all supposed to be enrolled in a "program", some type of scheduled activity that would theoretically rehabilitate us. My "program" was attending college.



Generally speaking, the RCCA personnel came in three broad types. There were plenty of self-important true believers who thought themselves to be doing good
things for the homeless mentally ill, and were horribly condescending to all the residents and questioned our judgment on each and every little thing, but weren’t malicious about it. There were the sadistic ones like Jerry Durst and Tony the security guard, people who got a jolt of pleasure from dehumanizing and humiliating people, who had probably gravitated toward these kind of situations because of the perpetual supply of powerless victims. And then there were people like John Fanshaw, who were mildly cynical about the world, its institutions, and the fairness of things, who enjoyed helping people where they could and didn’t see the residents as entirely different from themselves, but rather as people in a complicated and unfortunate situation or two.


One of the ongoing themes in the book is the discrepancy between an alleged commitment to client self-determination and self-governance and the realities of institutionalized care of this sort. The intersection of attitudes towards people with a psychiatric diagnosis and attitudes towards homeless people was not a comfortable place to be.


—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback. eBook version and hardback versions to follow, stay tuned for details.



Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for GenderQueer now and for Guy in Women's Studies once they come out.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
Dear NeuroDiverse Comrade:

I'm sorry you found what I posted to be offensive. I totally respect your right to speak out and fight back against the marginalization you get subjected to in our difference-intolerant society. You're tired of the attitudes that get doled out to people who have a mental illness diagnosis. I get that.

But -- speaking as a person who has received enough official psychiatric diagnoses to collect them like postage stamps, including bipolar, paranoid schizophrenic, and borderline -- we need to have the right to decide for ourselves whether our difference is a pathology. And while I don't mean to dismiss whatever efficacy you've gotten from the treatments your doctors have provided, we do get to critique the medical-model interventions that have been pushed at us, sometimes without our having the option of refusing.

Let's backtrack in history just a bit, shall we?

GAY PEOPLE were considered not only immoral and perverted, but mentally ill. Being gay was a pathology, a wrongness of how the mind worked, messed up if not necessarily willfully deficient in morals.

WOMEN, straight as well as lesbian, were often told that if they had any issue with fitting themselves in to the patriarchal society and its expectations and limitations, well, the problem was within them.

TRANS people, of course, were long thought to be suffering from a pathological "gender identity dysphoria", and regardless of whether our society's approach to accommodating their condition involves helping them transition or instead trying to reprogram them, we start with defining them as mentally disordered for thinking of themselves as a gender that doesn't match their body.

And GENDERQUEER and NONBINARY and GENDER NONCONFORMING people have had both forms, too, sometimes having our very existence defined as a pathology and at other times our reaction to how we're treated and regarded defined as a pathology.

Designating us as mentally ill has long been a part of dealing with the inconvenient and problematic. It pinpoints the location of all social problems that involve us as being inside us. It says we aren't oppressed, nor are we understandably traumatized by our social situation . It says nobody is going to understand us any better by listening to us and empathizing with what we have experienced, because we don't make sense, our brains themselves are messed up and full of misbehaving neurons.

It's a belief that grew out of the desire for a disease model for all human suffering. We had become very good, very effective, at dealing with infections and physical maladies, things that could be studied by reducing things to symptoms and causes within the body's own processes. It was hoped that all human pain and suffering would turn out to boil down to that model.

It's also cheaper, a concern of insurance companies and public policy makers who have budgets and cost containment to consider. Pills are a lot cheaper than open-ended counseling, let alone the prospect of social upheaval and structural social change.



But you wish to lump me in with people who blame you for failure to achieve milestones of success. "Oh, you don't understand that I have a mental disability. Since you question the legitimacy of mental health treatment, you clearly think we're all fakers and malingerers and we should just dust off our asses and get over it. Well shut up, we have no time for your privileged hateful cluelessness. You need to quit spouting your bullshit about how it's all just capitalism or patriarchy or whatever, because you're just victim blaming even if you're too dense to see it!"

You're particularly upset that I challenge the claims that the mental health industry makes about its pills. You don't want to hear that studies show that the brain compensates for psychiatric pharmaceuticals if you keep taking them over a long period -- that the drugs that inhibit reuptake of neurotranmitter chemicals cause the brain to maintain fewer receptors or to produce less of the chemical, and the drugs that try to limit certain chemical reactions tend to cause the brain to increase its sensitivity to those chemicals. Which makes the drugs have less effect while creating a physical dependency on the drug that can make it difficult to withdraw from it.

Well, statistics can't tell us that that's necessarily how your body is reacting to what you take. Statistics don't work that way. Research can show that a tendency exists but not that it will happen for everyone the same way. Perhaps psychiatric medication does wonders for you. I'm no one to question what anyone else finds useful or helpful in their search for ways to cope with their situation.

But we are opposed to involuntary modification of how people's minds work, and that means not only opposing direct forced treatment but also misrepresentation of the medical facts. Medical consent has to be fully informed consent. And despite decades of claiming that mentally ill people have a chemical imbalance in our brains that their perfect pills fix, the way that insulin fixes diabetics' inability to produce their own insulin or the way that people without working thyroid glands need to take synthetic thyroid, it just isn't so. Schizophrenia is not a olanzapine deficiency disease. Bipolar is not a lithium deficiency disease. Depression is not a zoloft deficiency disease.

That doesn't mean they don't help you or that you should not take them if they do, but drug companies and doctors lie to patients -- they oversimplify and they misrepresent, and they do not trust patients to make their own medical decisions -- and nowhere is that a more prevalent pattern than in the specific area of mental health.



So no, I am not going to simply let you classify me as a privileged non-disabled asshole, and I'm not going to hide in the corner and stop representing the concerns of activist psychiatrized people.

—————


My first book, GenderQueer: A Story From a Different Closet, is published by Sunstone Press. It is available on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in paperback, hardback, and ebook, and as ebook only from Apple, Kobo, and directly from Sunstone Press themselves.


My second book, That Guy in Our Women's Studies Class, has also now been published by Sunstone Press. It's a sequel to GenderQueer. It is available on Amazon and on Barnes & Noble in paperback. eBook version and hardback versions to follow, stay tuned for details.



Links to published reviews and comments are listed on my Home Page, for GenderQueer now and for Guy in Women's Studies once they come out.

———————

This DreamWidth blog is echoed on LiveJournal and WordPress. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————


Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
When I was 38, my girlfriend broke up with me. She indicated that her life had become too complicated to maintain a relationship – too many other demands on her time and energy. And Iw as obviously just casually involved, enjoying the connection for the sex and fun. She knew it wasn’t serious for me because I hadn’t tried to restrict her from dating other guys and, besides, I was a guy. Things are different for guys, she said. It might hurt now but within a month or so I’d be dating someone else.

The combination of this characterization and the horrifying prospect of trying to flirt and date again kept me sidelined for over a year in hurt and anger, and then drove me into a more specific despair. I felt alien, unknowable.

I had come to New York City 12 years earlier, to find support and understanding and community as a male who felt and thought differently than other males; I’d come to New York as a would-be activist heterosexual sissy. But I hadn’t found others like me or an identity-community to be an activist within.

Since I had counseling services covered by my employer-issued health plan, I made some calls, wanting someone to talk to.

“Oh, yes, there’s term for that now, and a lot of literature about it, it’s called gender identity dysphoria. Can I schedule you for next Tuesday?”

That snapped-in, over-the-phone diagnosis was partially correct. I was in serious distress, I was feeling very poorly understood in all my available social environments; I felt trapped and imprisoned within the set of beliefs and assumptions that I was a Man. But the diagnosis was partially incorrect as well: I did not have any issue with my body or with how my body per se was categorized by the people around me.

My real complaint lies not with the specific inaccuracy of the diagnosis, but with the mindset behind it, the tendency to medicalize differences, to define them as pathological. I was, as I said, in distress, but my difference was not and is not an ailment. Even if the distress would not have been occurring if it weren’t for my difference, the difference wasn’t and isn’t the location of the malady.

This was not the worst offense of this nature that I’ve experienced. In 1979, I had gone to the university medical clinic’s walk-in therapy facility to talk about feeling like I was more of a girl than I was kin to the other boys, only to be told “We know what causes that now” and prescribed Stelazine, an antipsychotic neuroleptic drug.

Medicalizing, or “psychiatrizing”, people’s differences – such as being gender-atypical – defines the problem as residing in the suffering person’s own self, when in cases like these the problem actually resides in society and its shared systems of beliefs and understandings. Or lack of understandings, if you prefer.

This mindset, this clinical behavior on the part of therapists and therapeutic practices, is an outgrowth of our western medical tradition, where patients are subdivided up into systems and organs and thought of as ailments to which the correct medical intervention merely needs to be applied. The right pill, the appropriate intervention. The tendency is exacerbated by the insurance companies, which pay for the treatment of ailments (“please provide the diagnostic code on line 7”), and medical malpractice law, which sees culpability for anything going wrong when a specific medical malady is not addressed with the established protocol.

———————

This LiveJournal blog is echoed on DreamWidth, WordPress, and Blogger. Please friend/link me from any of those environments on which you have an account.

————————

Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
I've been blogging since 2014, but starting last spring, I began doing something a bit different: I started echoing these blog posts on a high-traffic fast-moving general-purpose message board.

To put things into perspective, here on LiveJournal a given post will sometimes get a comment, maybe even two; on its DreamWidth clone, a couple of comments were entered during the year; on Facebook, where I post links to the blog on several gender-related groups, I'd get a couple "likes" and an occasional comment as well; meanwhile, on the Straight Dope Message Board, copies of these same blog posts generated 415 replies during one week, 279 on another, with people interacting with each other as well as with me and my own replies to their comments and so forth — a full-blown conversation.

Well... I have always thought that if I had people's attention for long enough, I'd make sense to them, they'd get it. That even if some people took an adversarial stance or became dismissive of me and what I was saying, I would be making sense to enough people that I'd have supporters, and that the overall weight of public opinion would have my back.

And, well... it didn't work out that way.


The first post in the series that I reposted to the Straight Dope was Regarding Matters Psychiatric, which delved into what happened in the spring of 1980 in the weeks and months after I first came out: some people on campus found me disturbing and unsettling, they couldn't make sense of the things I was saying with such fervor and intensity, and they began to wonder about my state of mind — perhaps in part because I was obsessing so much about sex and sex-related matters, which are considered personal and somewhat weird to talk to people about, perhaps in part because I was behaving as if I was onto something of earth-shattering, game-changing importance, but probably mostly because people who are this excited and passionate about some set of ideas have usually acquired those ideas from some religion or cult or other font of ideology, but I had apparently made mine up on my own.

So I suppose it is fitting in a way that I have just finished a year trying to make sense to the folks at the Straight Dope, being intensely focused on the things I wanted to explain to them and discuss with them, mixing my own home-brewed gender theory with anecdotes from my personal life and, as the months ticked by, leaving them more and more with the impression that here amongst them was someone who was very self-immersed, very obsessed with a bunch of ideas that didn't make much sense to them, someone who was impervious to their attempts to get me to realize that this stuff either doesn't matter or isn't anywhere near as important as I act like it is... in short, someone disturbing and unsettling who kept posting things they couldn't make much sense of, someone who struck them as not being in a very stable and balanced state of mind.


Well... I've always been out, on the message board, as a psychiatric patients' rights advocate and activist against psychiatric oppression. There have been times when there have been debates about forced treatment and patients' rights and a few people have said I was too coherent to be a real psychotic:


When I first read your posts on this subject it took me a while to realize that I fell into a "True Scotsman" fallacy about you: No true schizophrenic could be so functional, rational and lucid, therefore you could not be a true schizophrenic.


So, on the bright side of things, I guess the people of the Straight Dope now have a more direct and personal experience of how it might be possible that someone like me, who is not a danger to anyone and who merely has some strongly held odd ideas, might be experienced as someone whose mental status comes into question, even to the point that school authorities request that he be put on a locked ward for evaluation. Yeah, deja vu all around: this is pretty much how it went down in 1980. (Except that having a lot of cyberspace between me and the denizens of the Dope seem to have ameliorated any sense of compelling in loco parentis type responsibility).


On the less bright side, it's very frustrating and rather demoralizing. I tend to think I write well. That I express myself in words quite skillfully and can make some very complex concepts materialize in verbal form. Maybe instead I write with great opacity, making sense mostly only to myself.

And of course I'm trying to get a book published. Let's not forget that. The book isn't written as a work of gender theory (fortunately), and I like to think it is written in language that is a hell of a lot less off-putting. Still, the bottom line is that I wrote it with the confidence that if I had people's attention for that amount of time I would make sense to them, I could show them how it was and they would get it, and yet that's also what I expected of my blog posts... so you can see how this is kind of worrisome, yes?


The replies I got over the course of the year gradually escalated in hostility, contemptuous dismissal, and in their frustration with me. The Readers' Digest Condensed Version of their reaction to me was that, while they understand transgender people, I wasn't trans, since I was not at odds with the body in which I was born, and therefore I should get the fuck over it, I wasn't much different from many other male people who also weren't John Wayne or the Marlboro cowboy. And that, furthermore, I was the one going around stating that men in general have chacteristics A, B, and C, which others observed and I myself observed were characteristics that I lacked, while women in general had characteristics D, E, and F, which both I and other people observed that I did have — and by making such statements and observations, I was the sexist one mired in traditional gender assumptions and beliefs.

I think many of them found it frustrating that after they had pointed this out, I kept on doing it. I was being stubborn, dense, and it was annoying to them: they'd pointed out the error of my ways, and although they outnumbered me I wasn't taking their word for it! We've all told him, over and over, how many times do we have to tell him? Yeesh, he's thick as a brick!


Is there any less humiliating spin or interpretation I can put on their reception to my ideas and my attempt to express them? Well... yeah, actually, although in my position I need to be cautious about embracing the explanations that make me feel good, if you see what I mean... anyone in my situation should seriously consider that maybe they're not saying important meaningful things that make sense after all. But having said that...

• Things that I say seem crazy to people sometimes because they don't already understand it. To state the almost ridiculously obvious, it is easier to understand something you've already listened to and understood in a slightly different form before than to understand something that's more completely new.

• Add to that the fact that I'm one individual person, and we don't actually tend to take individual people's thinking seriously. It's as if folks secretly believe that all ideas actually come from outside of people's heads. Last week's blog post, in fact, was in part about the audacity of saying "we" to refer to a not-yet-established social identity. I've also spoken on occasion about socially liberal modern culturally aware people who behave as if they had been issued a little paper score card listing all the marginalized outgroups they need to care about.

• Meanwhile, gender and sexuality are areas of powerful emotional content for all of us; we all tend to have a degree of emotional investment in the models of such things that we hold in our own minds. And, as Elizabeth Janeway once said,

[T]oday's facts are embedded in today's situation. We accept them as being self-evidently true, as signifying what they are; or at least, we try to. We are unhappy with puzzles and ambiguities, uneasy with shifting roles and mysterious behavior. Why?

Because they demand something from us. Present events act on us and call for action by us. Since we can change them, not simply define or describe them, they acquire a moral presence. They pose a question of responsibility, and by doing so they change the way we look at them.



Well... (I apparently like to write "well..." a lot)... anyway, yes, I have found all this disconcerting and worrisome, and yet my ideas still make sense to me, including the idea that this stuff is important and is worth expending the time and energy trying to put it out there. So despite doubts and insecurities about it, I am, on balance, inclined to continue doing what I've been doing.


————————

I am now echoed on DreamWidth, like many other LJ folks. My DW acct is here. Please friend/link me on DW if you are a DreamWidth user.

————————

Index of all Blog Posts
ahunter3: (Default)
Last week I made another presentation to gender studies students, this time at Castleton University in Vermont. The hosting professor booked a lecture room -- one of those rooms with bleacher seating and a stage-like area up front for the lecturer -- and brought students from several classes to hear me speak. It was my largest single audience to date, about 65 people.

Before the presentation, he took me to dinner and got me checked in at the bed & breakfast, and we chatted about identity and growing up and coming out.

He warned me, "Now, this is a very non-diverse community. We're talking white rural people and small-town families, folks whose families have lived here for generations. They tend to be very stoic. They don't express surprise or amusement or agreement or disapproval, they keep their reactions inside. It's something that's an element of cultural pride in these parts". He took some more of his steak and potato and a sip of wine and continued, "Mark Twain came here once. People traveled from all around the area to hear him speak. And the whole time he spoke, they just sat very politely in their seats with their hands in their lap and didn't crack a smile the whole time".

I ended up being very glad that he had warned me about this. My audience was attentive enough, some people were even taking notes. No one was slouching and staring off in other directions or texting on their phones. But yeah, it felt like I was addressing a roomful of carved granite faces. I could not tell how I was doing other than by comparing my own rhythms and the pace at which I was going through my topic points to what I could recall of how I'd done those things in the past.

I was only able to elicit one question at the end, although it was a good one: "Do you find that people with a background in the hard biological sciences who focus on genetics and neurology to be resistant to these kinds of ideas?" (I replied with examples pro and con -- the "con" being researchers who were involved in trying to make a case for medical insurance companies being bound to covering medical transitioning for transgender people who seek it, and the "pro" example being neurologist Debra Soh and her column criticizing gender-neutral parenting).


Although it felt good overall to address yet another audience, the stone-faced audience left me feeling unsettled for several days, and eventually I realized it had evoked some associated emotional content for me, that it connected in my mind with a pattern I have some reason to worry about.

You see, back in 1980, when I was first coming out on University of New Mexico campus, I kept having the experience of handing out my writings and then going back to those same people to discuss the material, and people more often than not were cautious, saying very little about my core ideas and instead taking some small lateral idea and talking some about that. For instance, an older woman student from my Sex and Sexuality biology course talked about countercultural guys in the 1970s and how they had horrified their parents by growing their hair long and that their talk of peace and rejection of militarism had hit a button for the older generation who perceived them as very unmanly. It certainly wasn't irrelevant but it left me in the dark about what she thought about feminine guys upending the conventional notion of heterosexuality and what it could mean for feminism and for the rest of society and so on.

By the time my dormitory resident advisor was aking me to please go across the street and talk with the mental health folks at the university's medical center, I had spent an intense month trying to talk to people, trying to write my thoughts down and get students and professors and other people to read them and give me a reaction, and that had been the general pattern: people not directly addressing what I had brought up, and being very vague about what they thought of it, neither hostile and argumentative nor excitedly enthusiastic, just...cautious.

And because it was so important to me, this set of new ideas and their power to explain things, I began to imagine and guess a lot about what was really going on behind people's closed faces. I was expecting my ideas to be very polarizing: threatening to some people, exciting and revolutionary to others. Confronted with all these noncommittal reactions, I imagined that they were feeling highly ambivalent and needed more time to process these ideas. I imagined that they saw the potential impact but that some parts of that potential impact did not look like an unalloyed good thing, so they were holding back. I imagined that people who were gay or lesbian or were supportive of gay and lesbian rights and concerns were wondering and worrying that promoting the notion of a "heterosexual sissy" could have homophobic or hetero-normative social impact. I imagined that people who were feminist or feminist supporters were worrying about the impact of a male person pushing a new feminist-type agenda from so much of a "for his own personal reasons" standpoint, a very different thing than males being political participants in order to support women. I worried that conservative-minded people were hearing this as yet another assault on conventional sexuality and gender and were formulating negative and judgmental attitudes towards what I was describing, that their first reaction to "heterosexual sissy" was a disapproving and biased one. I imagined that people thought I actually had a different agenda of some sort, whether pro-male or pro-feminist or pro-homophobic or anti-christian or anti-transsexual or whatever. Or that what I was saying was going to play into one of those agendas.

I was really overthinking it all. The truth of the matter -- easier to look back on it and see it in retrospect -- is that most of them were not understanding more than a small spatter of what I was trying to communicate. And that a double-handful of the rest understood my main points but disagreed with me that they were important points and didn't see that they added any new understandings or new possibilities, that they didn't see why I was making a big deal out of this.

I have never believed that my mental state in spring of 1980 remotely justified placing me in a locked-ward setting and treating me as if I was incoherent. When I realized the extent to which I had been failing to make sense to people, and had disturbed them with all the intensity with which I was making the attempt, I laughed at myself and I reset my expectations immediately. I at no point in my life rejected the thoughts that had obsessed me then as nonsensical or as unworthy of the obsession. And I've gotten way better at expressing them, I think!

But I haven't forgotten the grandiose thought patterns. The tendency to assume I am affecting people whether they express their reactions or not, and, with that, the tendency to assume other thoughts in their heads -- their reaction-thoughts -- include reasons for them being so noncommunicative. Because I still do that. When faced with lukewarm or off-topic reactions to my material I tend more often to believe that what I've said or written has pushed some of their buttons, instead of jumping to believe that I didn't make sense to them or that they don't attribute any sense of value and importance to what I said.

Some of that is unavoidable. Any person attempting social change that involves putting forth new ideas has to rely on a degree of optimistic projection, of anticipating that their ideas will indeed affect people strongly. And you can't let indifferent reactions shut you down, because new ideas are, by definition, alien and will not be immediately and wholeheartedly embraced.

But it's unsettling. Grandiose extrapolation of this sort IS a form of not being fully in contact with what is real. It has gotten me into trouble in the past. And it is a way of thinking that does not come with its own built-in lid. It can self-perpetuate to the point of thinking that the outcome is preordained, the participants' roles already written in advance, and all people involved representatives of Huge Social Forces that they represent in this little theatrical play, very dramatic and with grave portent and Massively Important Things always hanging in the balance. It's addictive to anyone who is trying to have a genuine impact on the world in which they live. Don Quixote never wants to see himself as a silly fool trying to joust with a windmill that is neither a real opponent, nor the joust a purposeless endeavor with no possible meaningful outcome.

————————

I am now echoed on DreamWidth, like many other LJ folks. My DW acct is here. Please friend/link me on DW if you are a DreamWidth user.

————————

Index of all Blog Posts

June 2025

S M T W T F S
12 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 09:16 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios